The Celtics trailed by 12 in the first quarter but Brad Stevens quickly rallied his Celtics to bounce back and trounce the Milwaukee Bucks 99-83 on
Tuesday night. Isaiah Thomas started once
again for the injured Marcus Smart, contributing a game-high 20 points despite shooting just 1-10 from 3-point range.
This was an impressive victory. The C’s clearly still have some issues to
sort out in the frontcourt, but fortunately Greg Monroe and the Bucks’ massive
size advantage was overshadowed by the performance of the Celtics high-powered
bench. The Celtics bench once again
outscored their starters 50-49, even with Thomas in the starting lineup.
Depth proved to be a critical factor in this game,
especially when Avery Bradley went down with a lower leg bruise. Rookie R.J. Hunter was thrust into meaningful rotational
sets for the first time in his young career and the potential future face of the franchise did not disappoint.
Hunter knocked down 3-5 jump shots for seven points, but
more importantly showed off an ability to contribute in a multitude of
ways. He pulled down seven rebounds in
just nineteen minutes, while David Lee, Kelly Olynyk, and Jonas Jerebko
collectively gathered seven rebounds in a combined 58 minutes.
Hunter also showed active hands and incredible tenacity on defense. His lateral footwork could be better, but he showed resilience in fighting through screens and sticking on his assignment. He had a nice steal and a beautiful block from beyond in the second half, all contributing to an impressive + 19 plus/minus.
Hunter also showed active hands and incredible tenacity on defense. His lateral footwork could be better, but he showed resilience in fighting through screens and sticking on his assignment. He had a nice steal and a beautiful block from beyond in the second half, all contributing to an impressive + 19 plus/minus.
Despite not registering any assists, Hunter passed the ball
very effectively, further emphasizing his high basketball IQ. Stevens showed a lot of confidence in the
rookie by making him the direct beneficiary of Bradley’s injury minutes. If Bradley is out for an extended period, then
Hunter might see a huge increase in playing time; if he keeps playing like
this, then those are minutes that he might never give back.
Stevens is already drawing up plays specifically designed
for Hunter, such as this one.
Hunter's sharpshooting and versatile skillset makes him an extremely effective weapon in the Celtics offense. Bradley is one of the best on-ball defenders in the league, but
Hunter might already be the better overall shooting guard. R.J.'s untapped scoring potential makes me
giddy. Regardless of Bradley’s health, there
is no question that Hunter deserves regular rotational minutes. He is far ahead of the rookie curve and rapidly
developing into a great NBA player.
Now There's a Tommy Point! In the game’s final minutes, Hunter was
visibly exhausted after making a series of hustle plays. He had already been on the
court for almost the entire second half and Stevens decided to pull Hunter out of the lineup to let him rest with
the game essentially in the bag. But Hunter wasn't feeling the bench. Within
sixty seconds, he was back up at the scorers table, eager to check back into the game. This kid loves to contribute whenever and
however he can. When you watch him play, it is
easy to visualize the great player that he will become. Hunter will soon become a Tommy Point machine.
Hunter has all the talent and all the intangibles to become a
great player, especially on a Celtics’ team that needs an identifying face of the
franchise. I cannot wait to bust out my
#28 jersey for the first time at the TD Garden later this month. With Hunter’s impressive play, the team on
the upswing, and the potential first overall pick in next year’s draft thanks
to Brooklyn, the future is starting to look very bright in Boston.
The C’s are back in action tonight in Boston against an
inconsistent Indiana Pacers team. The Pacers
play a ton of small ball, led by Paul George and Monta Ellis. They will be looking to run, so the game
should be fun because both teams flourish in fast-break situations.
The Celtics get the edge thanks to their depth, speed, and disruptive backcourt defense. The Pacers defeated the Celtics by two points last week, but the Celtics have played drastically better since then and should be able to come away victorious tonight.
The Celtics get the edge thanks to their depth, speed, and disruptive backcourt defense. The Pacers defeated the Celtics by two points last week, but the Celtics have played drastically better since then and should be able to come away victorious tonight.
Prediction: Celtics win 98-95. The Celtics are the better team, but
back-to-backs are never easy and George and the Pacers play with a ton of passion and physicality. The Celtics should be able to maintain control
and dictate the pace, but the game will be close. Look for Thomas to score around 30 points in
this small-ball oriented matchup. If Bradley
cannot play, look for Hunter to continue impressing while clawing his way
towards the top of the depth chart.
Good, and timely article on RJ. It does a great job showing how plus-minus might be the most under-rated stat in the NBA. I wasn't able to catch the game but when I saw the box score I did notice that he had by far the best plus-minus but his other numbers were just OK, nothing special. Then I read your article you literally just gushed about how he was all over the court literally catalyzing this blowout win in every possible way- making hustle plays everywhere and making it easier for his teammates to do THEIR jobs. The level of your enthusiasm about how his game went is exactly in line with the plus-minus stat on the box score.
ReplyDeleteThere are two kinds of plus-minus players. The more common plus-minus champs are the same guys getting the rest of the stats. LeBron's a great example. Players like that make the stat meaningless because it doesn't tell you anything new. But then there are players like RJ who the stat was really made for - running all over the place making things happen that don't show up in other stats. I wish there were a way to make it easier to tell the difference. The NBA needs a pure "catalyst" stat. Plus-minus works but only up to a point.
thanks
DeleteGood, and timely article on RJ. It does a great job showing how plus-minus might be the most under-rated stat in the NBA. I wasn't able to catch the game but when I saw the box score I did notice that he had by far the best plus-minus but his other numbers were just OK, nothing special. Then I read your article you literally just gushed about how he was all over the court literally catalyzing this blowout win in every possible way- making hustle plays everywhere and making it easier for his teammates to do THEIR jobs. The level of your enthusiasm about how his game went is exactly in line with the plus-minus stat on the box score.
ReplyDeleteThere are two kinds of plus-minus players. The more common plus-minus champs are the same guys getting the rest of the stats. LeBron's a great example. Players like that make the stat meaningless because it doesn't tell you anything new. But then there are players like RJ who the stat was really made for - running all over the place making things happen that don't show up in other stats. I wish there were a way to make it easier to tell the difference. The NBA needs a pure "catalyst" stat. Plus-minus works but only up to a point.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeletenice base ball post
ReplyDeleteHello Jonathan,
ReplyDeleteCongratulation for your great victory. The skill of your team is really nice and you have some talented player in your team. Want to know more skill visit my blog . I like the way you describe about Stevens skill. Thank you for sharing with us.
I enjoyed the information lot. Thanks for sharing this information.
ReplyDeletehunting tips